© MARTIN BESECKE 2010 - 2018 ALLE RECHTE VORBEHALTEN.
mb mb MARTIN BESECKE I • N • V • D • D
EN|RU
EN  RU
The goal of integration, unity, of a common Europe or even a true world community in which the people live together peacefully and with equal rights, with a world government led by wise, responsible and prudent politicians, must be striven for! Because this goal is laid out in the universal, which means, that it means, so to speak, the destiny of the humanity anyway. The problem is just, that neither the humanity in its entirety has already developed to the level of development, that they can really live and practice such a community from their very inner, nor are such politicians anywhere to be seen. One can i.a. recognize it, that today's nation states as first constructs represent a grown and common cultural, legal and value space in which different cultures, traditions and peoples can practice a common living together, but this development process even in the nation states is far not completed. Due to its institutional, structural and political design is the current European Union over-bureaucratic, intransparent as well as uncommunicative and above all, utterly undemocratic. And as the reality shows, such a design in practice promotes everything else as a pan-European consciousness. That is why there is the need to think the further development steps based on the current level of development and experience! At the moment there are two models in the wider public, the idea of the United States of Europe on the example of the USA, and the idea of a federal republic of Europe with in many topics independent regions, with the simultaneous abolition of today's nation states on the example of the Federal Republic of Germany. Both models, however, have existential systemic errors. The United States of Europe ultimately means a power concentration of the classical kind in a central government with all the negative developments already known, such as negative striving for power, abuse of power, corruption and ideologies. While the idea of the federal republic means the abolition and negation of already existing national cultures and thus again a return to again only regional and local cultural spaces with all the associated negative developments, such as demarcation and homogenisations right up to the smallest states, so that in the end would mean a real step backwards to the universal goal of a true world community. Because a negation of already existing cultures has always failed and has led to much suffering and radicalization, because cultures always go in to the anthropological and also in to the causal-karmic. Furthermore, both models implement policy systems that have already revealed their dysfunctionalities at the nation state level. Because that the whole well-known existential overall systemic negative developments, like the destruction of environment and nature, the increasing social inequity and inequality, the overall systemic domination and power of design of the economy and money and as a direct result, the cutback of democracy and the cutback of universal human rights and fundamental values and not least, the increasing political and social resurgence of the nationalism and authoritarianism, can even be created in this way and can progress unhindered as well demonstrate the systemic dysfunctionalities as well as the structural deficiencies of the societal conditions of communication and participation of the existing democratic political systems and thus also those of the centralist and the federal system. In addition, that these two democratic political systems can only allow today's unitary and general competence parties, which but bundle all political and social themes for power-political reasons, but above all, in a structurally quite unobjective way. This in turn leads due to the monarchical leadership paired with the party discipline automatically to an unobjective and thus incompetent and uncommunicative treatment of many topics. This basically means, that it has to go to a true advancement of the democracy itself towards a structural full-communicative and therefore full-democratic system that can create and guarantee real systemic structures of communication and realization so that our lived and everyday thinking can actually construct and realize the social reality and in which the solutions to our existential problems can actually be negotiated in a real societal discourse. And in addition, especially for Europe, that it has to go to an equal be together, an equal partnership, an equal communication at the systemic level of the different already existing national cultures, so that from this level of development can develop a pan-European consciousness, and not should mean the step backwards again to only regional and local cultural spaces. The political and social system of Value-levels-democracy has recognized these dysfunctionalities and deficiencies and fix them and learned from the mistakes of the past and creates and, above all, ensures the systemic framework conditions for the necessities which named here. The Value-levels-democracy is based on the value-stepped reflection-system-theory of Four-segmentation and means in practice the transformation of the democracy into a value-stepped four-chamber parliament, the executive and legislative and also the institutional und structural segmentation of the system into the four systemically relevant areas of economy, politics, culture and fundamental values, whereby they to be brought for the first time ever to a pertinent and full-democratic treatment. At the European level, this means in practice 4. a fundamental values parliament:     Due to the highest value grading of the fundamental values parliament exists for the first time the possibility to be able to form the pan-European     social coexistence of fundamental values.     As well, by doing so, get the fundamental values a direct democratic control and treatment.     This possibility can not be provided by the current democracy systems, wherefore e.g. the European Convention on Human Rights is permanently     bowed down or broken by the politics, even though it has constitutional status for all EU countries, because the European Convention on Human     Rights is not subject to any democratic treatment at the systemic level.     Because of this, mean e.g. such commissions like the ethics commission in Germany also no solution, because it represents a non-systemic     institution, which means that their proposals have no legally binding character, but their implementation is subject only to voluntary.     Moreover, also this commission is not subject to any democratic treatment, which is why it is accordingly elitist-entranced and uncommunicative     towards the society. 3. a culture parliament:     In this parliament, the different already existing national cultures can communicate on systemic level on an equal footing with each other     and can negotiate on systemic level a fair coexistence.     And only an equal communication on systemic level can make a development towards a pan-European consciousness up to a pan-European culture     possible in the first place. Because in this parliament, the diversity of the European cultures finds their democratic expression. 2. a politics parliament:     This parliament makes the possibility to design a pan-European right, a pan-European constitution and a pan-European foreign and security policy     through a real pan-European democratic process. 1. an economy parliament:     Through this parliament, the legal framework is established that the economic system, the economic interaction with each other finds a pertinent     and democratic treatment. This means in practice for the first time in the history of the world the creation of a true economic democracy.     And there the economy parliament has to take the legal requirements of the higher-ranking parliaments binding into account, does it automatically     leads to a community serving and not dominating economy, as in today's reality. This value-stepped four-segmentation of the system results from the four levels of reflection of the interpersonal communication. The humans communicate with each other on four levels of reflection: 1. The subject-object level Based on my own needs, views, intentions and freedoms, I treat the other instrumentally and thus only as an object. This communication is unreflected. 2. The one-sided-strategic level I use the other and his freedoms strategically for my own interests. This communication is one-sided-simply-reflected. 3. The communicative level We take each other's freedom, expectations and wishes seriously and take communicate with it. This communication is mutually-double-reflected. 4. The meta-level I take a stand on this de facto mutual (of the gaze) position (embarrassed, friendly, dismissive, etc.) and at the same time I take a stand for the opinion of the other: repeated reflection of the mutuality or final reflection. This communication means in practice the metacommunication, we agree, mostly tacit-implicit, on behavioral norms. These four levels of communication are represented by the four sub-parliaments, whereby the system can to communicate with the people and vice versa at all levels of reflection, and that for the first time in the history of social systems. While today's democracies, due to their one-dimensional institutional and mono-structural design and the resulting overall systemic dominance of the economy, can communicate only at the lowest level of reflection, the subject-object level. Here is also the real reason to find why the existing democracies are increasingly experiencing rejection and are really in the erosion. Because the thinking and the consciousness of the people is meanwhile much more developed and differentiated and can not be satisfied only from the economic point of view. The people are also increasingly responding to cultural, ethical and fundamental values topics. And the Value-levels-democracy establishes the necessary systemic structures of communication and realization so that this evolved thinking and awareness of the people can be expressed in the systemic through a peaceful-democratic way. This four-segmentation of the system also means that today's all-responsible parties will be replaced by area-specific theme and subject parties. This enables European theme and subject parties at the European level, which, in turn, make pan-European discussions on subject topics and thus a pan-European communication structurally possible in the first place. Because this differentiation into the four system areas and the resulting area-specific subject and theme parties means in practice the constructive synthesis of direct and parliamentary democracy, the fundamental renewal of the societal conditions of communication and participation towards a full-communicative and thus full-democratic pan-European society! And only factual discourses about all political, social and systemic topics that can actually be conducted by truly all people on a truly pan-European level can make the development of a pan-European consciousness possible in the first place! And the Value-levels-democracy establishes the systemic framework conditions for these necessities and can guarantee it! Here the whole concept as PDF file!  >>