© MARTIN BESECKE 2010 - 2021 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
mb
EN|RU
EN  RU
MARTIN BESECKE MB INTERNATIONALES NETZWERK WERTSTUFENDEMOKRATIE INTELLECTUAL GAMES
On this page, issues about future topics are thematized in loose sequence that should inspire to question and think!
How to master the climate change?:  Efficiency vs. Holism?  Old Thinking vs. New Thinking? So far, the climate change is still seen and dealt with as a single issue. And from this point of view, the view is increasingly gaining ground that the climate change can be mastered only with efficiency. This approach is being put by powerful actors on the political agenda with pressure. To these actors belong i.a. Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, the founder and head of the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab (The Great Reset), and of course the Silicon Valley as well as the chinese government who follow the ideology that everything has to be made more efficient. These include i.a. the health, the agriculture, the foodstuffs/food, the political decision-making processes and actions as well as of course the mastering of the climate change. And that, of course, can only work with a complete digitization of all levels and areas of life  -  and that, of course, only for the benefit of the private sector of the economy, only for profit and power interests. However, this approach is fundamentally wrong and doomed to failure, because the climate change can only be successfully mastered with a holistic, an integral knowledge and understanding, only with a holistic, an integral approach. And this holistic, integral approach includes the inner under- standing that everything is connected and interacts with each other, or in other words, that the whole Universe and everything that is in it is an one single entity, an one single being, as well as the overall systemic understanding, because the climate change represents also a question of the system. But the one-sided and pure focus on efficiency through digitization and technical innovation is the exact opposite of holism! Furthermore, this approach represents the old thinking, which is expressed in the fact, among other, to have to capture, conquer, fight, defeat, control and dominate everything and everyone, but also in the fact that we keep voting for the same politicians, even though we know that they do not serve the common good because we have gotten used to it and accepted that that is the way it is. But the old thinking and acting negates, denies and excludes the universal fact that everything is in interaction with one another, that everything is an one single entity, an one single being, which is why it is so destructive. That is why the procedure of the sole efficiency, digitization and technical innovation ultimately only means a continuation of the old thinking and acting and thus only a “continuing as before”, only “business as usual” and the further rejection of the being human, the nature, the natural (universal) principles, relationships, modes of functioning and interactions, the democracy and the necessary harmony with the whole, as well as the one-sided transfer of the self-responsibility and self-determination to, among other, artificial intelligences instead of develop further ourselves. And on the evidence of the existential state of our planet, this old thinking and acting, still practiced to date, has to be described as clearly failed! So the mastering of the climate change also requires a necessary new seeing, thinking and acting that reflects the knowledge that everything interacts with one another, that everything is an one single entity, an one single being, and the imperative to live in harmony with the whole. But the humanity in its entirety is still very far from this knowledge and understanding. And accordingly there is still no political force that shows a real holistic understanding, also not the Green Parties and also not yet Fridays for Future and, by the way, also not the science, with the exception of a few individual scientists and in the first rudiments the quantum physics, as well as, also in the first rudiments, the Psychoneuroimmunology, but only in the area of health / medicine (body-soul-mind relationships and modes of functioning). And that is why we are currently still limited to answering the question of how to finance the necessary climate protection measures? (Which, but so far, due to what has been shown, are only patchwork!) But due to the still prevailing neoliberal thinking in the politics, the costs of the measures are almost completely shifted on to the consumer, with the exception of very small compensation options. And due to the global neoliberal framework conditions and the resulting negative overall systemic developments, such as the increasing social ine- quality, of course, this approach will automatically only increase the social inequality further, which in turn will bring the entire project to failure. Because if the decided measures immediately become a social question, of course the climate protection has no chance. Which in turn shows that with the existing neoliberal system (and a debt brake) the climate change cannot be mastered. Therefore, there is currently only the only way that all necessary climate protection measures, such as the conversion of the energy generation, the decentralization, the conversion to a circular economy, the renewal and conversion of all heating systems, the building refurbishment and insulation, the conversion of the agriculture and the mobility, the conversion and construction of the necessary infrastructures and manufacturing facilities as well as the education of the necessary skilled workers, must be fully financed by the state! That is concretely: All the necessary measures are financed by the central banks and not by tax revenues and taxpayer funds, which would specifically mean in practice, especially with the existing interest-based monetary system, to have to stick to a destructive growth-oriented economy. So that means, the money required is simply printed by the central banks. And after the completion of all measures, there is then a debt cut, with which the additionally printed money and, above all, the resulting systemic instabilities are taken out of the market and eliminated. Incidentally, this procedure has already been successfully practiced several times in the past, keywords: the so-called year of release or the “Year of Jubilee” in Europe and the “well-ordered insolvency” in the USA. And even with this ideal case, it will be very difficult to be able to implement the necessary climate protection measures in the remaining very short period of time. Not only because of the very short period of time, but also because there are not enough raw materials available for the necessary conversion and because recycling processes do not yet exist for many emission-free technologies. All other approaches and paths will take considerably longer. Will this approach ultimately prevail in politics and in the society or will we persist in "old thinking and acting" for intellectual dullness, ideological reasons and power maintaining, which in turn is likely to mean failure to master with the climate change? Corona: Health thinking new? Since 2020 we have been dealing with a so-called “pandemic”, the so-called “Corona pandemic”, triggered by the Covid-19 virus or the Covid-Sars-2 virus, which went around the whole world. But also with this virus, as in principle with all viruses, one can observe that many millions of people become infected with this virus, but only a relatively small percentage also develop symptoms of disease, and even much less then also die of it. Why is that? There must be a reason for that? The reason for this is that disease patterns that are triggered by a virus also have psychosomatic causes! This means that a topic is active in one of which one should become aware and which one should then explore, work on and overcome. And the causal issue that a virus can also trigger clinical pictures, such as respiratory diseases and the associated other symptoms of disease, is: mass negativity, a negative belief in statistics and a from that resulting negative and dependent thinking, negative thinking about the life, from that resulting (great) fears, existential fears, a great anger and bitterness about certain life circumstances and contexts and from that resulting a lack of joy to take in the life completely! This is also the reason why older people develop symptoms of illness and die from them far more often than young people, because alone the longer life span makes them much more likely to build up this topic in oneself. So one can see that the causal issue for viral diseases is of a more complex nature and that the causes for one's own living conditions, which can lead that one to build up this topic in oneself, can be of different origins. But, based on the number of cases, it can be clearly deduced that the existing systems clearly promote the height of the case rates, especially those of illness and death! This means that the existing systems produce living conditions that lead that one to build up this topic in oneself! Examples: For example, in Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, France, the USA and Great Britain, in the Central and South American as well as in many Asian countries, the number of cases are many times higher than e.g. in Germany, Norway, Sweden and Denmark. Why is that? In Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal, the systems there have been destroyed to such an extent by the ultra-neoliberal “austerity dictates” in context with the so-called “financial crisis” of 2007/2008 that they have not recovered to this day and, above all, because of the forced excessive privatization of common property paired with the global neoliberal framework conditions, they can not really recover either. France has never really introduced the neoliberalism in France, which has resulted that France being decoupled from the neoliberal world system in many ways, which in turn has led to great economic upheavals. Then Macron came along and wanted to make the country “competitive” again with neoliberal reforms, which of course only made the situation much more worse. The USA and Great Britain no longer have any real neoliberal systems, but have largely turned negatively into libertarian systems. And in the Central and South American as well as in many Asian countries, in addition to this, there are often openly corrupt and power-abusing, in some cases also dictatorial systems with a lot of exploitation, suppression and great poverty. In all of these countries the people are under a great existential pressure, and that of course promotes the fact that one to build up this topic in oneself and from that resulting the case rates. There is also the fact that due to the causal issue for viral diseases, to work with fear, like the politics does here willful, is the falsest and most negative way ever! Now one wants, so to speak, to “defeat” this virus with a vaccine. However, this project will not work, as one could and should already know from the flu viruses! Because despite numerous flu drugs and vaccines as well as the formation of their own antibodies, millions of people fall ill with flu again every year.  -  (Regardless of the fact that several hundred thousand people worldwide die of flu every year, and not to mention of the many thousand of deaths from multi-resistant germs and bacteria in Germany alone.)  -  In the meantime, one could also draw this conclusion from the current “corona pandemic”, because more and more people who were previously ill suddenly develop symptoms of the disease again, which according to the conventional medicine actually cannot be  -  (and therefore also must not be),  -  because these patients actually developed immunity, that is antibodies. And a vaccination is nothing more than that weakened pathogens are added to one so that our body produces antibodies. Furthermore, viruses are constantly mutating, which is why they cannot really be targeted by a vaccine. And above all, this project will of course not be able to work because external (healing) methods can only soothe the symptoms, but cannot really cure them, because with a like here only vaccination the actual causal issue for the disease is neither worked on nor overcome. Because as long as the relevant topic is active in one, it will definitely to cut one's way again. So this will be the next existential experience that the humanity will face! How will the people then deal with it, above all with the background that also this virus will not go away again, but will stay? Will they slowly become aware that illnesses have completely different causes and accordingly have to be viewed and dealt with in a completely different way? Will the people slowly realize that their belief in the (conventional) medicine actually means giving up their self-responsibility as well as their indepen- dence and self-determination and that a real healing with such thinking and acting cannot be possible at all? And from that resulting: Will they start to question the existing system of the almost completely neoliberal privatized health economy, and as a result of this, which only thinks and works in a profit-oriented manner and, in addition to it, which meanwhile has systemic relevance for the need for growth, but what in practice means that it can only secure and guarantee its profits and thus growth if the people definitely get sick and, above all, stay sick if possible?  -  (Contexts and relationships that are particularly evident i.a. in the examples of the antibiotic research that is no longer taking place as well as the diabetes medication. And it is precisely the “Corona crisis” that has proven the unsuitability of a neoliberal health system that has been reduced purely to profit maximization.)  -  And in turn from that resulting: Will the people recognize the hypocrisy and spiritlessness of the ruling “elites” who refuse to gain knowledge and the resulting necessary further developments solely for reasons of system and thus power maintaining? Or will they, out of fear and panic, allow and even support the development towards dictatorial measures and systems?  -  (Which in principle will almost inevitably come due to the internal logic of the previous measures and the political thinking that can be seen in them!) Addition, March 2021:  Incidentally, the cause of this pandemic was actually a laboratory accident and not a virus that bypassed the species barrier! One have to know that for many years a (also government) research with naturally occurring, harmless viruses is financed also by government funds with the aim of creating viruses artificially that are much more dangerous for the humans and, for example, can attack other organs in addition to the respiratory tract as well as being able to bypass the species barrier. The problem is just that the relevant research facilities cannot be hermetically sealed  -  it is simply not possible  -  so that there are many leaks and therefore viruses can break out at any time. Due to this fact, the relevant expert scientists sounded the alarm in 2012 and predicted that a global pandemic will break out in the next 10 years. With that they meant that it could not break out, but will break out definitely. As a result, this research has been banned in 2014 by the Obama administration in the United States and out- sourced to China, among others, but continues to be co-financed by the US government. Do we really need such research? And if so, for what? Artificial intelligence as a world saver and world corrector? In order to gain widespread approval and acceptance for artificial intelligence among the population, the supposed advantages of artificial intelligence are always mentioned first and for the rest as only that artificial intelligence can eradicate hunger and poverty, can save the climate as well as create and secure world peace. All existential problems that we humans seem to be unable to solve, as the reality seems to prove? Or are the causes not based on the fact that the system-defining power elites are simply not interested in solutions and do not even allow them at all? In any case, the reality is that such artificial intelligence is neither researched nor worked in any other way, but the fact is that all financing structures and thus, of course, also the systemic and state financing structures are only aimed at areas that can be used against the people, such as maximizing profits, collecting and evaluating of personal data, espionage and surveillance as well as the military and warfare, so AIs are used as an instrument of power and domination. Nevertheless, let's do the following intellectual game: Let us assume that such artificial intelligences would actually are used! What would be if these artificial intelligences came then to the conclusion that in order to eradicate hunger and poverty, we should redistribute more fairly, we should refrain from today's unfair distribution of property, we have to stop the unproductive money gain and the unconditional maximization of profit, we have to reverse the digitalization in the world of work and put the people in work with an adequate income, we have to abolish and reconstructure our capitalist (neoliberal) economic system? What would be if its came to the conclusion that in order to achieve and ensure world peace that we i.a. should no longer consider and treat economic and geo-strategic and -political interests purely selfishly and enforce and secure them with warlike means, that we should stop the Deep State activities? Would we do that then? All obvious and, above all, logical solutions that have been formulated and demanded by many people with an alert and common sense and seeing-can eyes for decades, but which have been dismissed and reprimanded as leftist communist nutjobs! Would we do that realizing at once just because that said an AI now?   Would we do that? And if yes, what does that say about us humans? We, the only beings who are capable for self-reflection, who can consciously develop further independently and self-determined due to our soul and awareness assets  -  (also spiritually). We, who can think (dialectically) with our intellectual abilities and who have developed and programmed artificial intelligence in the first place. Do we no longer trust our own abilities, insights and knowledge? And if yes, why? Because we have already removed ourselves very much from being human and his abilities that we want no longer to trust and to believe ourselves? And as a result: Because on the whole we have become so dependent and incapable that we have to transfer our self-responsibilities on other? Questions that are still largely in the hypothetical, but still have a real reference and therefore a justification!