© MARTIN BESECKE 2010 - 2018 ALLE RECHTE VORBEHALTEN.
mb
Here the whole concept in English language as PDF file!
The Value-levels-democracy • • • • The value-stepped reflection-system-theory of Four-segmentation! The transformation of democracy into a value-stepped four-chamber parliament! The executive and legislative and also the institutional and structural segmentation of the system into the four systemically relevant areas of economy, politics, culture and fundamental values, whereby they to be brought to a pertinent and full-democratic treatment! The constructive synthesis of direct and parliamentary democracy! The fundamental renewal of the societal conditions of communication and participation towards a full-communicative and thus full-democratic society! The philosophically deduced, competent action- and system-theoretical, constructive-peaceful-renewing political and social system of horizontal authority! The rapid advancement of democracy itself! Developed by Prof. Dr. Johannes Heinrichs!
Today we have many overall systemic negative developments, like the destruction of environment and nature, the increasing social inequity, the overall systemic domination and power of design of the economy and money and as a direct result, the cutback of democracy and the cutback of universal human rights and fundamental values. But that these negative developments can even be created in this way and can progress unhindered as well demonstrate that these negative developments are system-related. It demonstrate the systemic dysfunctionalities and also the structural deficiencies of the societal conditions of communication and participation of the existing democratic political and social systems. The necessity for new systemic institutions and structures! And that also means that an only change of policy is no longer possible because the structural design of the system and its legal manifestation, such as by the neoliberal anchored in international law global free trade agreements, do not allow necessary changes. Even only a tinkering with democratic instruments, such as the sole direct democracy or the so-called “citizen dialog”, or reforms alone, such as the basic income, do not effect sustainable solutions. That is why it needs a fundamental renewal of the overall systemic conditions, in fact institutionally, structurally, contentwise and legally, for to permanently eliminate these overall systemic negative developments! And the Value-levels-democracy ensures this necessary fundamental renewal of the conditions! Its has recognized these dysfunctionalities and deficiencies and fix them and learned from the mistakes of the past! The Value-levels-democracy is based on the value-stepped reflection-system-theory of Four-segmentation and means in practice the transformation of democracy into a value-stepped four-chamber parliament, into 4. a fundamental values parliament     (with the mediums: world view, ethic, morality, spirituality, religion, value-axioms and rites), 3. a culture parliament     (with the mediums: education, science, media, art, cultural identity affairs, society and language), 2. a politics parliament     (with the mediums: territory, ground and land, traffic, homeland and foreign security, home and foreign affairs, tax and financial policy,      social and welfare policy, law and constitution), 1. an economic parliament     (with the mediums: consumption, production, trade, economic and monetary system), which are elected separated from each other and which are, after a priority regulation, autonomous in their responsibilities. Priority regulation means that e.g. officially accepted fundamental values (expressed in democratically legitimized laws) are above economic interests, if these economic interests should undermine these fundamental values. Due to the institutional design of today’s democracy systems, today’s parties are all-responsible parties, which bundle all political and societal topics power politics and in a very unobjective way. And of course, due to the monarchical leadership and party discipline, leads this automatically to an incompetent and uncomminicative handling of many topics. But through this differentiation of the system, today's unobjective major parties, which stand for everything, but therefore also for nothing exact, will be replaced by area-specific subject and thematic parties, such as economic or ethic or tax or foreign affairs or law and constitution parties. And this effectively promotes and supports the independent and responsible leadership of thinking, experience, knowledge, reason and good sense, expertise and competence at system-institutional and system-structural level. As a result, today's monarchically governed systems will be replaced by collegial and factual communication structures. This in turn leads to a power unbundling and to a prevention of negative power structures. And that promotes in decision-makings on inter-parliamentary topics, a constructive and substantive argumentation, the recognition of the true and the right and provides the necessary transparency in information exchange and representation of interests, such as Lobbying. In summary, that means the executive and legislative and also the institutional und structural segmentation of the system into the four systemically relevant areas of economy, politics, culture and fundamental values, whereby they to be brought to a pertinent and full-democratic treatment and that for the first time in the history of the world. Each election becomes both an area-specific and a pertinent election. More democracy by differentiation  =  diversity against the simplicity! And exactly these area-specific and pertinent election options means in practice on the one hand the constructive synthesis of direct and parliamentary democracy, but especially the fundamental renewal of the societal conditions of communication and participation towards a full-communicative and thus full-democratic society, in which the pluralistic will of the people is fully heard and comes into its own. And with that the Value-levels-democracy answers the questions: Under which conditions of communication can societal debates be conducted? Who is to speak, and how can the messages be well-ordered, correlated and effectively implemented? How can people negotiate the solutions objectively and peacefully, possibly with understanding and trust? And in which all persons, and that means really all, can have their say? One thinks that is a question of personal decency and peacefulness. But this view is naive and wrong. Because it is precisely in the systemic that the right institutional structures are needed in order to be able to produce and guarantee the greatest possible communication and the best possible decision-making conditions. And the Four-segmentation produces these necessary systemic communication conditions and secures them legally. These systemic communication structures guarantee a rule-free discourse and prevent speech and thought prohibitions. What would it mean, if several economic systems or parties, with their different concepts of economic activity, stood for election in a truly democratic decision-making process? Current alternatives, such as the "solidarity economy" and the "post-growth economy", in which much right is formulated, also considers, like today's capitalism, an economic system with a unique position. This raises the question whether, because of this, are not also fundamentally dominant and undemocratic developments inevitable, as we already know from the present capitalism? Likewise, these alternative economic concepts like to consider themselves as complete, overall social systems. But this is factually wrong, because a social system is fundamentally more complex and multi-dimensional and can not be considered and renewed solely by the economy. It is an existential misunderstanding to believe that the social whole can only be regulated and satisfied by the economy. This one-dimensional thinking, based only on the economy, is also called economism. But through the sub-parliament economy, the legal and structural conditions for a real economic democracy are created for the first time. And because the economic parliament has to take into account the value preferences of the higher-ranking parliaments, such as from the fundamental values parliament, it automatically leads to a community serving and not dominating economy, as in today's reality. And by the realization of a fundamental values parliament exists for the first time the possibility to be able to form the social coexistence of fundamental values. The Value-levels-democracy or the Four-segmentation thus creates and guarantees through this differentiation of the system the necessary systemic realization structures for to make necessary innovations, such as a new economic or monetary system or the legal establishing of new human rights, constructively, peacefully and democratically possible. Because this differentiation of the system into the four sub-parliaments and diverse thematic parties guarantees a multitude of topics on system-institutional and system-structural level, whereby they are automatically brought into a societal, political and democratic process. In summary, this institutional and structural differentiation of the system creates and guarantees a permanent factual and especially an effective pertinent communication between politics/government and civil society, and that system-structurally and legally secured. And that means in practice the ending of today's intellectual, political, communicative and emotional impotence and incapacitation of the civil society. In addition, this promotes the knowledge that diversity is fundamentally necessary as an essential prerequisite for any form of further development. And that means a fundamental paradigm change in sight, thought and action and a departure from the unsuitability of today's monocultural system. The deep inside of human, the ability to self-reflection and self-determination! The Four-segmentation or the Value-levels-democracy is competent action- and system-theoretical and up to now the only democracy model that is completely philosophically deduced. It has recognized that institutions and structures have a significant influence on the socialization of the people. Through the one-dimensional institutional and structural design of the existing democratic political systems, it promotes primarily negative thinking and acting, such as negative striving for power, abuse of power, egoism, conformism, irresponsibility and corruption and also ideological power blocks. Thus, the present policy systems inevitably cause the emergence of machiavellian power elites, because in the today’s systems only power groups can determine and form the social whole. This relationships in turn promote the emergence of so-called karmic spaces, of which only automatically specific characters, personality structures, inner development levels and ways of thinking and acting are attracted, approved and promoted, whereby these negative developments are sustainably conserved and which can best be explained with the (spiritual) meaning of the word: “Politics is a dirty business. But dirty businesses are only made by dirty people. Clean people do not do dirty businesses, because they can not do that from the whole inside!” It is also about the necessary consideration of the factor of the reality of human in the forms of power hunger and power obsession, nepotism, corruption, cliques, ruthlessness, intriguing and hypocrisy, which the Four-segmentation has recognized, in contrast to all other political systems, and by their value-stepped differentiation of the system areas prevented. This automatically prevents also the emergence of system-determining power networks. Beyond that, these contexts prevent, above all, an intellectual independence and individual responsibility on the population, which in turn can lead to forms of political and personal dependence as well as to unreflective and unhealthy loyalties. The Four-segmentation is based on the reflection- and action-theory of social behavior developed by Heinrichs, which goes far beyond previous views of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Karl Marx, Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann, by doing they understanding the institutions themselves as products of interpersonal reflection and also in addition the explicit reflection, that is, the normatively determined thinking and acting by the system, as in Marx, also the implicit reflection and thus the necessary universal sociality of the human can grasp and work with it. His epochal new discovery are the levels of reflection primarily between the individuals, the interpersonal reflection and communication, the methodical self-development of people's inner reflective life into practical societal action. Through the multi-dimensional logical-systematic design by Four-segmentation based on this reflection- and action-theory, it promotes primarily positive thinking, reason and good sense, expertise, integrity and the so-called “good will” of the people, a term used in sociology, philosophy and spirituality, and also a real intellectual and emotional independence. The Four-segmentation really promotes the mental and emotional independence and self-reliance, intellectual autonomy and independence, and activates the awareness of not only being a politically active part of the whole, but actually of being a politically active part of the whole. And that, taken together, can bring about a positive socialization and further development of the human being. This results in the knowledge, that it is above all the public systemic institutions that can bring about the better in the human. Thus, the Four-segmentation puts the human being in the center, without thereby following an idealized conception of human and how he has to be, but on the basis of how he actually is. Quite in contrast to many current alternative policy and social systems, such as the grassroots or basic democracy, which emanate from an idealized image of the human and which can only work if the people actually correspond with this idealized image, but what they do not do in the reality. For the good of the whole! The Value-levels-democracy also ends the existing patriarchal system, by doing by the sub-parliament culture a real social emancipation of the woman becomes possible. This is where the reflection- and action-theory of social behavior comes in, by doing they understanding the universal sociality of the human and working with them. Because the patriarchy comes from the universal sociality of the human, in fact from the male and the female, because nothing can exist over millennia in the negative if it does not come from the universal sociality of the human. Furthermore, the Four-segmentation resolves another system-related maldevelopment! A society as a whole can be roughly divided into two orientations, in "left-wing" and in "conservative". Both are inner structurings of the humans, which making it extremely difficult to turn a left-wing into a conservative and vice versa. Both orientations contain, from universal consideration, fundamentally right things, but also fundamentally wrong things. But the existing political systems cause an inevitable stockbuilding and where, in principle, they collide irreconcilably, which in turn promotes ideologies, enemy stereotypes, dogmas, political blocks, prohibitions of thinking and speaking and culture struggles. But in the Value-levels-democracy become by the differentiation by the Four-segmentation these two inner structurings structurally automatically combined and factually related to each other. In this way, the universal right things of both orientations can be constructively worked out and established for the good of the whole. Because from universal consideration both structurings belong together!!! In sum, the Value-levels-democracy creates and guarantees the required framework conditions and real systemic realization structures so that our lived and everyday thinking can actually construct and realize the social reality. It means a structural full-communicative and thus full-democratic system, in which the solutions to our existential problems can actually be negotiated in a real overall societal discourse. The Value-levels-democracy means the rapid advancement of democracy itself, while on the other hand we are dealing with only quarter-democracies today. It is transferable in all size units and a peaceful implementation is guaranteed by the introduction about the law.
mb MARTIN BESECKE I • N • V • D • D
EN|RU
EN  RU